Fred D. WAKEFIELD, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding ignorance of the law “is not a factor that can warrant equitable tolling.”
• holding ignorance of the law “is not a factor that can warrant equitable tolling”
• neither a litigant’s pro se status nor ignorance of the law normally warrants equitable tolling
• neither a litigant’s pro se status nor ignorance of the law normally warrants equitable tolling
• “Ignorance of the law usually is not a factor that can warrant equitable tolling.”
• ignorance of the law “is not a factor that can warrant equitable tolling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).