Skip to main content
· 9/2/1988

Fred B. Stacey, Jr. v. Warden, Apalachee Correctional Institution

Citations

  • 854 F.2d 401
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12018
  • 1988 WL 84827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that 28 U.S.C. § 2254 “applies only to post-trial situations”
  • “Pre-trial habeas petitions . . . are properly brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, which applies to persons in custody regardless of whether final judgment has been rendered.”
  • “Pre-trial habeas petitions . . . are properly brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, which applies to persons in custody regardless of whether final judgment has been rendered.”
  • “Pre-trial habeas petitions . . . are properly brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, which applies to persons in custody regardless of whether final judgment has been rendered.”
  • “Pre-trial habeas petitioners . . . are properly brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, which applies to persons in custody regardless of whether final judgment has been rendered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Henderson, Henley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.