Skip to main content
· 5/9/1988

Fred A. Smith Lumber Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Norman Edidin, Gary Edidin and Sam Pancotto

Citations

  • 845 F.2d 750
  • 11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 155
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing denial of sanctions against party and counsel for “employing the ostrich-like tactic of pretending that potentially dispositive authority against a litigant's contention does not exist, unprofessional behavior this Circuit refuses to tolerate”
  • Counsel generally acted in bad faith by filing a complaint for fraud in the hope that future discovery might uncover the allegations of wrong doing.
  • failure of the district court to address arguments made by the movants required remand, \as each of [the movants'] claims must be specifically and separately analyzed\
  • “the most important purpose of Rule 11 sanctionsS iasn tcot idoentse:r T fhriev oFleoduesr alilt iLgaawti oonf aLnitdig tahteio nab Aubsiuvsee practices of attorneys”
  • “the most important purpose of Rule 11 sanctions is to deter frivolous litigation and the abusive practices of attorneys”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cummings, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.