Freadman v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that employer’s offering plaintiff a reasonable accommodation precludes him from now arguing “that the company should have offered something different”
• holding that requesting an accommodation is protected conduct for a retaliation claim
• explaining that requesting an accommodation is protected conduct for purposes of the ADA’s retaliation provision
• explaining that a plaintiff’s request “must be sufficiently direct and specific,” and “must explain how the accommodation requested is linked to some disability” (quotation marks and citations omitted)
• explaining that, while a request for a reasonable accommodation constitutes protected activity under the ADA, a request for time off may or may not constitute an accommodation request
• explaining that in order for a request to comply with the ADA requirements, it “(1) must be sufficiently direct and specific, and (2) must explain how the accommodation requested is linked to some disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).