Frazier v. Waterman Steamship Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that suppression of testimony would not develop the truth when it was improbable that the witness could have been told anything substantial based on the new testimony given in court
• concluding that defense counsel’s “inattention or inadvertence” in conveying the substance of prior testimony to sequestered defense witnesses before they testified did not mandate exclusion of their testimony under the circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).