Frazier v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing that castle doctrine protects a worker in the workplace but making an exception where the aggressor was a co-worker
• agreeing with the Third District Court of Appeal that the “castle doctrine” applies to the workplace, citing Redondo
• agreeing with the Third District Court of Appeal that the “castle doctrine” “extends to protect persons in their place of employment while they are lawfully engaged in their occupation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-07.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-11-21· cited 5×
• State v. James
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-17· cited 4×
• Unis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-26
• In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-01
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2019-12-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Danford v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 33×
• Redondo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-03-04· cited 25×
• State v. Bobbitt
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-06-24· cited 22×
• State v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-09· cited 11×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-11· cited 1×