Frazier v. Badger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that immunity under the Tort Claims Act is an affirmative defense that must be proved at trial
• where general verdict is supported by at least one theory it will be upheld on appeal
• “Immunity under the [Tort Claims] statute is an affirmative defense that must be proved by the defendant at trial.”
• “[S]exual harassment by a government employee is not within the employee’s ‘scope of employment.’”
• “[S]exual harassment by a government employee is not within the employee’s ‘scope of employment.’”
• “This Court has held that the term ‘scope of employment’ as used in an insurance policy is broader than the term ‘scope of official duties’ as used in the Tort Claims Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).