Frazee v. Seaview Toyota Pontiac, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiffs need only establish one example of non-compliance in order to recover under any provision of 15 § U.S.C. 1601 et. seq.
• no viable TILA claim where “plaintiff entered into a retail installment contract that plainly disclosed finance charges” and “[d]efendant complied with disclosure requirements of TILA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).