Frazee v. Brazda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that $25 was not nominal damages, inasmuch as the jury \may well have concluded also that $25 was reasonable compensation for a superficial bruise or abrasion and that $25 was reasonable compensation for any medical treatment which may have been required by such an injury\
• determining that $25 was not nominal damages, inasmuch as the jury “may well have concluded also that $25 was reasonable compensation for a superficial bruise or abrasion and that $25 was reasonable compensation for any medical treatment which may have been required by such an injury”
• “Nominal damages are usually defined as a trivial sum and are usually represented by a judgment for one dollar or a lesser sum.”
• “Nominal damages are usually defined as a trivial sum and are usually represented by a judgment for one dollar or a lesser sum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).