· 3/12/1998
Fray v. Spokane County
Citations
- 952 P.2d 601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing court should interpret statute to avoid absurd or strained results
- reviewing court reads related provisions together so that they do not conflict
- reviewing court should interpret statute to avoid absurd or strained results
- in article II, section 19 challenge, only the title of the amendatory act was considered
- in article II, section 19 challenge, only the title of the amendatory act was considered
- courts avoid construing statutes in way that renders any statutory language \superfluous\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.