Skip to main content
· 3/12/1998

Fray v. Spokane County

Citations

  • 952 P.2d 601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing court should interpret statute to avoid absurd or strained results
  • reviewing court reads related provisions together so that they do not conflict
  • reviewing court should interpret statute to avoid absurd or strained results
  • in article II, section 19 challenge, only the title of the amendatory act was considered
  • in article II, section 19 challenge, only the title of the amendatory act was considered
  • courts avoid construing statutes in way that renders any statutory language \superfluous\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.