Frates v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Frates)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, “when a particular creditor’s rights are at issue,” the bankruptcy rules require more than the minimal notice required to satisfy due process concerns
• stating that, “when a particular 9 creditor’s rights are at issue,” the bankruptcy rules require 10 more than the minimal notice required to satisfy due process 11 concerns
• providing that a bankruptcy court’s application of procedural rules is reviewed de novo
• \We review 28 the bankruptcy court's application of procedural rules and whether -9- 1 a particular procedure comports with due process de novo.\
• “Here, the record shows that no attorney from the Reese Law Group ever appeared in 26 Debtors' bankruptcy case purporting to represent Wells Fargo and there is no other evidence to 27 show that Reese was authorized to accept service of process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).