Fraternal Order of Police v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing, inter alia, Pro. Golfers Ass’n of Am. v. Bankers Life & Cas.Co., 514 F.2d 665, 670 (5th Cir. 1975)
• “increas[ing] the profits to penalize the defendant for discovery violations, something that other laws and court rules are better equipped to handle,” is improper under the Lanham Act
• “Max Rack suffered no damages from the references, further undermining any entitlement to fees.”
• “Blatant trademark infringement might justify an award for the plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).