Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an insurance company that provided an e-mail service to its employees was an ECS provider
• finding an email that had been successfully sent and received was not in temporary, intermediate storage
• adopting \the reasoning of our sister circuits\ who have held that interception can only occur contemporaneously with transmission
• affirming denial of motion to amend where plaintiff “sought leave to file a[n] [] amended complaint to state [] two additional causes of action at the eleventh hour—the day before his opposition to [defendant’s] summary judgment motion was due”
• “The Pennsylvania Whistleblower's Law, 43 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1421, et seq., does not apply to private employers.”
• “Every circuit court to have considered the matter has held that an Intercept’ under the [federal statutes] must occur contemporaneously with transmission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).