· 9/27/2004
Fraser Construction Company v. United States
Citations
- 384 F.3d 1354
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20338
- 2004 WL 2152310
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a claim for constructive acceleration “arises under the changes clause”
- upholding factual findings under clear-error review even though “a trier of fact could have made a different finding”
- upholding factual findings under dear-error review even though “a trier of fact could have made a different finding”
- contractor must have “made a timely and sufficient request for an extension of the contract schedule”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Michel, Bryson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.