Franzi v. Superior Court of Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing standing to challenge an overbroad regulation of speech even though the challenger asserts the rights of third parties
• recognizing standing to challenge an overbroad regulation of speech even though the challenger asserts the rights of third parties
• “[T]he grand jury has the right to every person’s evidence, absent a constitutional, common law, or statutory privilege.”
• without sufficient facts “we presume . . . the actions of the grand jury were lawful”
• “[H]earsay evidence in a grand jury proceeding is not objectionable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).