· 10/21/2004
Franz v. Calaco Development Corp.
Citations
- 818 N.E.2d 357
- 352 Ill. App. 3d 1129
- 288 Ill. Dec. 669
- 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that whether the finder of fact is the trial court or a jury, the determination of whether punitive damages are available for the cause of action is a question of law reviewed de novo
- “Punitive damages are available as a matter of law for a breach of fiduciary duty”
- “[T]he trial court may submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury only if the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for such damages”
- good faith between contracting parties requires that a party vested with contractual discretion must exercise his or her discretion reasonably and may not do so arbitrarily or capriciously
- “Punitive damages are available as a matter of law for a breach of fiduciary duty”
- Mortgage Act “unambiguously gives a mortgagor a right to damages where the mortgagee does not comply”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Malley, Bowman, Kapala
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.