Skip to main content
· 10/21/2004

Franz v. Calaco Development Corp.

Citations

  • 818 N.E.2d 357
  • 352 Ill. App. 3d 1129
  • 288 Ill. Dec. 669
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that whether the finder of fact is the trial court or a jury, the determination of whether punitive damages are available for the cause of action is a question of law reviewed de novo
  • “Punitive damages are available as a matter of law for a breach of fiduciary duty”
  • “[T]he trial court may submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury only if the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for such damages”
  • good faith between contracting parties requires that a party vested with contractual discretion must exercise his or her discretion reasonably and may not do so arbitrarily or capriciously
  • “Punitive damages are available as a matter of law for a breach of fiduciary duty”
  • Mortgage Act “unambiguously gives a mortgagor a right to damages where the mortgagee does not comply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Malley, Bowman, Kapala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.