Franyutti v. Hidden Valley Moving and Storage, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff’s DTPA claim that the defendant moving company “charged him a higher amount than orally agreed to and delivered the goods at least three days late” was preempted
• finding that false or misleading representations regarding rate for guaranteed delivery damage resulting from those misrepresentations not preempted, due to a statutory provision requiring different rates for guaranteed versus non-guaranteed deliveries
• “[The Carmack Amendment] provides the exclusive cause of action for any claim arising out of the interstate transportation of household goods.”
• “Because [the Brown] holding occurred prior to many of the Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit opinions relied upon, it’s holding has limited value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).