FRANSMART, LLC v. Freshii Development, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a fraud in the inducement claim failed because the plaintiff “could not reasonably rely on oral statements that are contradicted by the plain terms of the [a]greement”
• explaining in a diversity case that “the choice-of-law question is a threshold issue”
• “Freshii claims that during the negotiation process Rowe represented that Old Fransmart would market and sell franchises for Freshii using a model for franchise growth and expansion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).