Frans Theron v. United States Marshal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “inquir[ies] concerning dual criminality and the statute of limitations [are] distinct”—that is, “[t]he focus of the [dual criminality inquiry] is on the conduct that the law criminalizes, not the statute of limitations”
• interpreting the “lapse of time” section as “establish[ing] the federal statute of limitations as the appropriate statute of limitations”
• applying U.S. federal law in a case involving comparable language in German treaty
• dual criminality satisfied because South African law, though broader, was analogous to U.S. bank fraud
• dual criminality satisfied because South African law, though broader, was analogous to U.S. bank fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).