Frans Nooren Afdichtingssystemen B v. v. Stopaq Amcorr Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Regarding claim con- struction . . . [the parties’] reasoning leaves us with a host of questions, which we think would be better addressed in- itially by more focused analysis – and, if necessary, more focused record development – on remand.”
• “[I]n patent claims as elsewhere, the construction of a clause as a whole requires construction of the parts, with meaning to be given to each part so as to avoid rendering any part superfluous.”
• first citing Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. M-I LLC, 514 F.3d 1244, 1251 (Fed. Cir. 2008); and then citing MeadWestVaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty and Closures, Inc., 731 F.3d 1258, 1270 n.8 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).