Franks v. Sematech, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a carrier asserts a claim belonging to the employee whether it sues in its own name or the employee’s name and whether it seeks only the amount of benefits paid to the employee or more
• stating that a carrier asserts a claim belonging to the employee whether it sues in its own name or the employee's name and whether it seeks only the amount of benefits paid to the employee or more
• stating that a carrier asserts a claim belonging to the employee whether it sues in its own name or the employee’s name and whether it seeks only the amount of benefits paid to the employee or more
• concluding employee could intervene even after limitations had run
• applying section 16.068 in context of workers’ compensation subrogation provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).