Texas Supreme Court· 1/10/1997
Franks v. Sematech, Inc.
Citations
- 936 S.W.2d 959
- 40 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 227
- 1997 Tex. LEXIS 4
- 1997 WL 7277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a carrier asserts a claim belonging to the employee whether it sues in its own name or the employee’s name and whether it seeks only the amount of benefits paid to the employee or more
- stating that a carrier asserts a claim belonging to the employee whether it sues in its own name or the employee's name and whether it seeks only the amount of benefits paid to the employee or more
- stating that a carrier asserts a claim belonging to the employee whether it sues in its own name or the employeeÂs name and whether it seeks only the amount of benefits paid to the employee or more
- concluding employee could intervene even after limitations had run
- applying section 16.068 in context of workers’ compensation subrogation provisions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Argonaut Insurance Co. v. BakerTexas Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 142×
- Antonov v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-30· cited 66×
- First Insurance Co. of Hawaii v. a & B Properties, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2012-03-14· cited 53×
- Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sonic Systems International, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-02-15· cited 40×
- Prudential Property & Casualty Co. v. Dow Chevrolet-Olds, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1999-12-21· cited 15×
- Mississippi Food & Fuel Workers' Compensation Trust v. TackettCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2000-03-28· cited 11×
- Tamez Ex Rel. Tamez v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-04-17· cited 10×
- Rodriguez v. CrutchfieldTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2009-11-24· cited 7×
- State of Texas v. Airgas-Mid South, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-07-30· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Texas Department of Transportation v. EsquivelCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-23· cited 6×
- Smith v. Financial Insurance Co. of AmericaTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2007-05-03· cited 4×
- State v. Michael G. LloydTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1999-06-09· cited 4×
- Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co. v. WedelCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-04-26· cited 4×
- Garza v. GarzaTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-10-19· cited 2×
- State v. AziosCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-04-23· cited 2×
- STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. EsquivelTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2002-05-23· cited 1×
- MISSISSIPPI FOOD AND FUEL v. TackettCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2000-03-28
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-06-30
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-06-30
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-04-30
Other cases named Franks v. Sematech, Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.