Franks v. Chapman
Citations
- 64 Tex. 159
Syllabus
<p>1. Will, signatures of witnesses thereto. — The witnesses to a will each wrote his name where it occurred in the body of the will and in the concluding sentence thereof, as follows: “And now, in the presence of H. L. Harrison, G. W. M. Duck, W. M. Smith, who I have requested to act as witnesses, I declare the writing contained in the foregoing ten pages my last will and testament.” (Signed) “ G. W. Chapman.” Held, that the signatures of the witnesses were sufficient.</p> <p>2. Same.— The fact that a county clerk, when called upon by a testator to witness his will, attaches thereto his official certificate of the acknowledgment of the due execution of the will by the testator, does not affect the validity of the clerk’s signature to such will, as a witness.</p>
Judges: Stayton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Will of Hull v. HullSupreme Court of Iowa· 1902-04-09· cited 56×
- Wich v. FlemingTexas Supreme Court· 1983-04-06· cited 42×
- Caesar v. BurgessTenth Circuit· 1939-04-11· cited 27×
- Ferguson v. FergusonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1948-04-26· cited 17×
- Ransom v. SiglerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1917-01-15· cited 16×
- Saathoff v. SaathoffCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1937-01-13· cited 11×
- Reagan v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-12-17· cited 8×
- Estate of FleishmanCalifornia Superior Court, San Francisco County· 1892-01-13
- Pickens v. Estate of FennSupreme Court of Alabama· 2017-09-29
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.