Frankowitz v. Propst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding treating physician did not have such identity of interests with the employer medical group and his co-practitioners such that amendment adding him related back to filing of original complaint
• because physician did not share \identity of interest\ with his colleagues and professional association, amended complaint, which added him as a party defendant in medical malpractice action, did not relate back to original complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).