Franklin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein this court held that `[a] false explanation given by the accused of any suspicious fact or circumstances tending to connect him with the offense is admissible in evidence against him.'
• wherein this court held that \[a] false explanation given by the accused of any suspicious fact or circumstances tending to connect him with the offense is admissible in evidence against him.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cumbo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-12-19· cited 507×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-10-07· cited 84×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-08-25· cited 52×
• Hayes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-11-25· cited 49×
• Neal v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-05-11· cited 25×
• Hewitt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-08-19· cited 18×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-08-25· cited 16×
• Grice v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-11-26· cited 14×
• State v. Mason
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-01-03· cited 11×
• Samuels v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-01-27· cited 3×