Franklin v. Southern California Motor Road Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because there was no reasonable probability the jury would have found expert credible, there was no reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different even if expert's testimony had been presented
• “In Nance’s cross-appeal, this Court affirms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).