Franklin v. QHG of Gadsden, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiffs state-law claims of misrepresentation, suppression, deceit, and fraudulent deceit had a direct connection to the administration of medical benefits under an ERISA plan and thus were superpreempted by ERISA
• plaintiffs acceptance of employment offer was conditioned on the promise that her husband would receive the same level of care under the new employer’s plan as he had been receiving under her previous benefit plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).