Franklin v. Northrup

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “an 15 unallocated offer of judgment to multiple plaintiffs is not effective under Rule 16 68” because no plaintiff would have been presented with a number against 17 which to compare his or her likely recovery
• affirming a fee award that was approximately five times the plaintiff's recovery
• affirming a fee award that was approximately five times the plaintiff’s recovery
• “That the fees awarded are, as the district court acknowledged, ‘nearly five times the amount of plaintiffs recovery,’ does not make them excessive.”
• “That the fees awarded are . . . nearly five times the amount of plaintiff’s recovery does not make them excessive.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• \The district court has discretion to con- sider settlement negotiations in determining the reasonableness of the fees but is not required to do so.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).