W.D. Michigan· 1/23/1998
Franklin v. Frid
Citations
- 7 F. Supp. 2d 920
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2170
- 1998 WL 275645
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that despite allegations of a school official's intentionally humiliating, poking, hitting, slapping, and verbally abusing a student, the \gravamen of the claim\ fell within the purview of the IDEA, requiring exhaustion
- concluding that despite allegations of a school official’s intentionally humiliating, poking, hitting, slapping, and verbally abusing a student, the “gravamen of the claim” fell within the purview of the IDEA, requiring exhaustion
- finding that the gravamen of the complaint concerned the denial of a FAPE despite allegations “of alleged physical and mental abuse that have no relationship to the IDEA[.]”
- dismissing § 1983 claims without prejudice pending resolution of administrative hearings regarding a plaintiff’s IDEA claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quist
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Muskrat Ex Rel. J.M. v. Deer Creek Public SchoolsTenth Circuit· 2013-04-23· cited 71×
- Sagan v. Sumner County Board of EducationM.D. Tennessee· 2010-07-06· cited 25×
- Alboniga v. School Board of Broward County FloridaS.D. Florida· 2015-02-10· cited 19×
- Kinkus v. Village of YorkvilleS.D. Ohio· 2007-03-13· cited 13×
- Covington v. Knox County School SystemSixth Circuit· 2000-03-06· cited 13×
- Tristan v. Socorro Independent School DistrictW.D. Texas· 2012-09-24· cited 6×
- Jackie Sabaski v. Wilson County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2010-12-17
- R.K. Ex Rel. J.K. v. Board of EducationE.D. Kentucky· 2010-12-15
- R.M. Ex Rel. R.M. v. Waukee Community School DistrictS.D. Iowa· 2008-12-05
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 994×
- Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationSixth Circuit· 1998-01-15· cited 752×
- Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc. v. Motorola, IncFifth Circuit· 1952-12-17· cited 341×
- Stella Hull v. Cuyahoga Valley Joint Vocational School District Board of EducationSixth Circuit· 1991-03-20· cited 267×
- Vivian Johnson v. Hills & Dales General HospitalSixth Circuit· 1994-11-16· cited 207×
- Albert J. Doherty v. American Motors Corporation, a Foreign CorporationSixth Circuit· 1984-02-24· cited 195×
- Charlie F., by His Parents and Next Friends Neil and Bonnie F. v. Board of Education of Skokie School District 68Seventh Circuit· 1996-10-24· cited 172×
- Terry F. Browder v. Ronald D. TiptonSixth Circuit· 1980-09-30· cited 123×
- Wendy E. Webb v. Thomas T. McCulloughSixth Circuit· 1987-09-17· cited 122×
- Agristor Financial Corp. v. Van SickleSixth Circuit· 1992-07-20· cited 117×
- Latecoere International, Inc. v. United States Department of the NavyEleventh Circuit· 1994-04-13· cited 110×
- N.B. Ex Rel. D.G. v. Alachua County School BoardEleventh Circuit· 1996-06-07· cited 92×
- Meretta v. PeachMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-09-08· cited 73×
- Transcontinental Leasing, Inc., and Hussein Z. Keilani, Cross-Appellants v. Michigan National Bank of Detroit, Cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1984-08-07· cited 62×
- Crocker v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'nSixth Circuit· 1989-05-01· cited 56×
- Vera Krijn v. Pogue Simone Real Estate Co., Ray Simone & Peter K. BrowneSecond Circuit· 1990-02-16· cited 53×
- Waterman Ex Rel. Waterman v. Marquette-Alger Intermediate School DistrictW.D. Michigan· 1990-05-22· cited 39×
- Lincoln v. Fairfield-Nobel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-07-06· cited 31×
- Harris v. BD. OF EDUC. OF COLUMBUS, OHIOS.D. Ohio· 1992-06-26· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.