California Court of Appeal· 1/29/1945
Franklin v. Franklin
Citations
- 67 Cal. App. 2d 717
- 155 P.2d 637
- 1945 Cal. App. LEXIS 1200
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “assignment of a bare right to complain of fraud is contrary to public policy”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1976-09-28· cited 151×
- Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-01-25· cited 101×
- In Re the Marriage of HorstmannSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-03-22· cited 88×
- In Re Marriage of AufmuthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-02-20· cited 85×
- Hugh Wendell MacDonald v. James A. MusickNinth Circuit· 1970-06-02· cited 56×
- Todd v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-05-12· cited 46×
- Soto v. VandeventerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1952-06-20· cited 35×
- Fields v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-04-26· cited 34×
- In Re Marriage of SlivkaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-07-10· cited 23×
- In Re Marriage of LorenzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-08-24· cited 23×
- Downing v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-11-05· cited 22×
- Berry v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1956-03-20· cited 22×
- Majors v. MajorsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-08-30· cited 21×
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.S.D. California· 1945-05-18· cited 20×
- Grant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-03-14· cited 19×
- In Re Marriage of PintoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-10-12· cited 18×
- Los Angeles Fire & Police Protective League v. RodgersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-05-08· cited 16×
- Magneson v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1983-10-20· cited 14×
- Cochran v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-12-08· cited 12×
- Washington v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-10-30· cited 12×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-01-13· cited 56×
- McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court· 1895-12-17· cited 55×
- Lamb v. HarbaughCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-01-28· cited 39×
- Haro v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-11-19· cited 21×
- Webb v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-12-16· cited 16×
- Neale v. Depot Railway Co.California Supreme Court· 1892-05-05· cited 12×
- Hiltbrand v. HiltbrandCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-04-21· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.