Skip to main content
· 9/25/1998

Franklin v. Brannock

Citations

  • 730 So. 2d 232
  • 1998 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 646
  • 1998 WL 656162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellee’s failure to challenge the final judgment with allegations of fraud within the one-year time limit of rule 1.540(b) “deprived the court below of jurisdiction to address this claim”
  • noting that “jurisdictional time limits such as the time for filing a notice of appeal or a motion for a new trial, may not be extended for any reason”
  • “Rule 1.540 expressly provides that a(b)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crawley, Robertson, Yates, Monroe, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.