Franklin-Mason v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pursuant to subsection (b), and in regard to “non-citizens, the state’s duty is to maintain an accurate voting list.... But the NVRA does not require a state to allow a non-citizen to vote just because the state did not catch the error more than 90 days in advance.”
• “This conclusion is inescapable: section 8(a)(3)’s prohibition on removing a registrant except on specific grounds simply does not apply to an improperly registered non-citizen.”
• “ ‘[Rjemoved’ in 8(a)(3) and ‘remove’ in 8(c)(2) mean the same thing. And there is no reason to believe the reference to removing a ‘registrant’ in 8(a)(3) means something different than removing ‘ineligible voters’in 8(c)(2) ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).