Franklin & Marbin, PA v. Mascola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a lawyer is entitled to his contract fee in the absence of a determination by a court that the fee contract is illegal, prohibited or excessive
• providing that a charging lien proceeding only applies when “identifiable property recovered as a result of the lawyer’s labors.”
• charging lien proceeding only applies when “identifiable property recovered as a result of the lawyer’s labors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).