Skip to main content
· 10/28/2013

Franklin Gill v. Eric K. Shinseki

Citations

  • 26 Vet. App. 386
  • 2013 WL 5791119
  • 2013 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating \that part of the Board's . . . decision that is on appeal is AFFIRMED\
  • noting the Secretary's reliance on his disability benefits questionnaire for hypertension to support his interpretation of Diagnostic Code 7101 Note (1), and finding that argument persuasive
  • stating “that part of the Board’s ... decision that is on appeal is AFFIRMED”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kasold, Davis, Pietsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.