Franklin Credit Management Corporation v. Rosa Miranda, Jorge Jose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• encouraging consideration of “prosecution history, which, like the specification, provides evidence of how the PTO and the inventor understood the claimed invention”
• “Lastly, we consider AFT’s assertion that the court erred by granting summary judgment dismissing AFT’s claim for willful infringement.”
• “A patent is a fully integrated written instrument; the claims must be read in view of the specification, of which they are a part.”
• “[I]n those cases in which the correct con- struction of a claim term necessitates a derivative con- struction of a non-claim term, a court may perform the derivative construction in order to elucidate the claim’s meaning.”
• “[I]n those cases 15 in which the correct construction of a claim term necessitates a derivative construction of a non- 16 claim term, a court may perform the derivative construction in order to elucidate the claim’s 17 meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).