Skip to main content
· 8/29/1994

Frankie L. Barber v. Whirlpool Corporation

Citations

  • 34 F.3d 1268
  • 9 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1492
  • 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 103
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23645
  • 1994 WL 462843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an eleven-page order setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law and dismissing defendant's post-trial motions did not satisfy the separate document rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Russell, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.