Frankel v. ICD Holdings S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the disclaimer waived the defense of fraudulent inducement because it made payment “unconditional and irrevocable” despite “existence of any claim, set-off defense or other right” of obligor and was a product of negotiations among sophisticated parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).