Frankel v. Heym

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[p]rotecting . . . citizens from usurious credit terms imposed when they are residents of the state” is a local interest sufficient for due process and for interstate-commerce balancing
• stating that the exercise of \a state's police power ... is sustainable absent an undue burden on interstate commerce which is clearly excessive in relation to local benefits\
• stating that the exercise of “a state’s police power ... is sustainable absent an undue burden on interstate commerce which is clearly excessive in relation to local benefits”
• noting that the police and tax powers are distinct and subject to different limitations
• upholding Wisconsin Consumer Act's \fee imposed ... to cover the costs of administering the [a]ct\ as valid exercise of police power
• upholding Wisconsin Consumer Act’s “fee imposed ... to cover the costs of administering the [a]ct” as valid exercise of police power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).