Frankel v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that defendant dentist’s alleged failures to correct his previous negligence could constitute “additional acts of negligence” so as to toll the statute of limitation
• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that defendant dentist’s alleged failures to correct his previous negligence could constitute “additional acts of negligence” so as to toll the statute of limitation
• failure of dentist to detect cyst, followed by improper placement of bridgework, analyzed as misdiagnosis case
• injury occurred when symptoms manifested themselves to plaintiff, and defendant’s failure to correct “previous negligence” not “additional acts of negligence”
• injury occurred when symptoms manifested themselves to the plaintiff, and defendant’s failure to correct “previous negligence” did not constitute “additional acts of negligence”
• injury occurred when symptoms manifested themselves to the plaintiff, and defendant's failure to correct \previous negligence\ did not constitute \additional acts of negligence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).