Skip to main content
· 11/6/2000

Frankel v. Board of Regents

Citations

  • 761 A.2d 324
  • 361 Md. 298
  • 2000 Md. LEXIS 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the University of Maryland, which is a part of the University System of Maryland, is an independent unit of the Maryland State government
  • recognizing that the University of Maryland, which is a part of the University System of Maryland, is an independent unit of the Maryland State government
  • opining that the State agency refund provision “is applicable when a state college or university charges a student more for tuition than is legally payable”
  • opining that the State agency refund provision “is applicable when a state college or university charges a student more for tuition than is legally payable”
  • noting only that because the claim was timely filed, it “would not be barred by the one year period of limitations in 12-202”
  • interpreting Frankel decision and distinguishing its holding that Frankel's claim was not barred by sovereign immunity, in the context of student challenge to UM mid-year tuition increase

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.