Frank Van Der Hule v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing three-step framework for reviewing whether a defendant has a qualifying conviction for § 922(g), including determining whether the defendant’s civil rights were restored
• “We addressed whether § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment in [Vongxay] and determined that it did not.”
• FOPA reflected Congress’s “intent to roll back certain restrictions on the rights of citizens to possess firearms . . . .”
• “[T]he NICS examiner who processed the background check concluded that [the plaintiff’s] prior convictions precluded him from receiving a Montana concealed weapons permit[.]”
• “§ 922(g)(1) continues to pass constitutional muster”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).