Skip to main content
· 7/12/1978

Frank v. Peckich

Citations

  • 391 A.2d 624
  • 257 Pa. Super. 561
  • 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • issue not preserved where two defendants involved, and request for binding instructions unclear on whose behalf
  • judgment n.o.v. may be sought only by party who submits point for charge requesting binding instructions
  • issues raised in post-trial motions must not be boilerplate and must be supported by appropriate legal argument setting forth theories in support thereof
  • the rendering of a judgment n.o.v. is a drastic act and should be entered only when the facts are such that no two reasonable persons could fail to agree that the verdict was improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Hoffman, Cer-Cone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Spaeth, Cercone, Van Voort, Watkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.