· 7/12/1978
Frank v. Peckich
Citations
- 391 A.2d 624
- 257 Pa. Super. 561
- 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- issue not preserved where two defendants involved, and request for binding instructions unclear on whose behalf
- judgment n.o.v. may be sought only by party who submits point for charge requesting binding instructions
- issues raised in post-trial motions must not be boilerplate and must be supported by appropriate legal argument setting forth theories in support thereof
- the rendering of a judgment n.o.v. is a drastic act and should be entered only when the facts are such that no two reasonable persons could fail to agree that the verdict was improper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobs, Hoffman, Cer-Cone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Spaeth, Cercone, Van Voort, Watkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.