Frank Ragozzine v. Youngstown State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that recusal was not required under 28 U.S.C. § 455 in a case involving a professor’s denial of tenure whe n the judge was dating a professor in a different department at the same university
• “[A] judge [must] recuse ‘if a reasonable, objective person, knowing all of the circumstances, would have questioned the judge’s impartiality.’” (quoting Hughes v. United States, 899 F.2d 1495, 1501 (6th Cir. 1990))
• “The statutory provision is binding on the courts as law applicable to whether 1 recusal is required. The substantially identical canon provision is a subset of a code of judicial obligations that are ethically binding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).