Frank R. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Sherman Act did not apply to an 13 eligibility rule governing the number of years student-athletes may compete
• rejection of examining psychologist’s functional 13 assessment which conflicted with his own written report and test results
• rejection of examining psychologist’s functional 13 assessment which conflicted with his own written report and test results
• to be reported at 12 F.3d 176

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).