Skip to main content
· 7/19/2021

Frank Paul Celaya v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We think that the trial of all four separate cases before the same jury at the same time over relator’s objection deprived him of the valuable right of a trial before an impartial jury in contravention of Art. 1. Sec. 10, of the State Constitution.”
  • discussing trial court’s discretionary decision whether to cumulate sentences
  • discussing trial court’s discretionary decision whether to cumulate sentences
  • discussing trial court’s discretionary decision whether to cumulate sentences
  • discussing trial court’s discretionary decision whether to cumulate sentences
  • discussing trial court’s discretionary decision whether to cumulate sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.