Frank Pasquino and Janice Pasquino v. John D. Prather, James Welch, and Terry Raynor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining harmless error as such error that is 14 “inconsequential to the ultimate nondisability determination”
• emphasizing “careful delineation between losses caused after the 14 company’s conduct was revealed, and losses suffered before the revelation”
• rule requires \reasons and explanations\ as to the facts and law leading to the ultimate conclusion
• va- cating an order denying qualified immunity and remanding because of confusion about its factual and legal predicates, cit- ing Circuit Rule 50
• rule requires “reasons and explanations” as to the facts and law leading to the ultimate conclusion
• “[T]he district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend 14 is particularly broad where plaintiff has previously amended the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).