Skip to main content
· 10/6/1994

Frank MOLNAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES OTIS ELEVATOR, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 37 F.3d 335
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27852
  • 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1
  • 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,401
  • 1994 WL 543199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discre- tion by amending a judgment to reflect the jury’s conclusion that the defendant’s conduct was willful

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Bauer, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.