· 10/6/1994
Frank MOLNAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES OTIS ELEVATOR, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 37 F.3d 335
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27852
- 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1
- 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,401
- 1994 WL 543199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court did not abuse its discre- tion by amending a judgment to reflect the jury’s conclusion that the defendant’s conduct was willful
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Bauer, Cudahy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.