Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Local Agency Law provides sufficient process to protect property rights for those seeking to challenge an agency decision
• explaining that the Local Agency Law provides sufficient process to protect property rights for those seeking to challenge an agency decision
• explaining that the pre-termination Loudermill hearing “merely serves as an ‘initial check against mistaken decisions’” and an impartial Loudermill hearing is not necessary as long as the state provides a “neutral tribunal at the post-termination stage”
• rejecting tenured professor’s argument that he did not receive adequate notice and explanation of the sexual harassment charges against him because he was not told or given the exact allegations made by the complainant
• notice of pre-termination hearing was constitutionally adequate since employee was suspended with pay and employee did not forthwith suffer a serious adverse employment action
• “Inasmuch as the pretermination procedures did not violate [plaintiff’s] rights, the individual defendants could not be liable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).