Frank M. Rossetto, Jerry Skidmore and John S. Borowsky v. Pabst Brewing Company, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a union does riot have standing to invoke CBA “grievance and arbitration clause” on behalf of retirees
• holding that a DFR can attach to a union acting as the representative of retirees even though retired workers are hot covered under' the RLA
• concluding that the union “lacks standing to bring the retirees' grievance to arbitration”
• concluding that the union “lacks standing to bring the retirees’ grievance to arbitration”
• explaining that, “[a]lthough a union has no duty to represent retirees, and retirees need not submit to union representation, retirees are free to make a union their agent if they so choose.”
• stating that if the union “loses in arbitration, the retirees lose, period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).