· 2/28/2013
Frank Hohn v. BNSF Railway Company
Citations
- 707 F.3d 995
- 35 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 53
- 27 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 938
- 2013 WL 709300
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that we \may affirm [summary] judgment on any basis supported by the record\
- rejecting similar argument that the jury must have conflated the essential functions inquiry with the direct threat inquiry and finding sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding that the plaintiff could not perform the essential functions of his position
- claim filed more than 90 days after an NEOC determination should have been dismissed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Bye, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.