Skip to main content
· 2/28/2013

Frank Hohn v. BNSF Railway Company

Citations

  • 707 F.3d 995
  • 35 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 53
  • 27 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 938
  • 2013 WL 709300
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we \may affirm [summary] judgment on any basis supported by the record\
  • rejecting similar argument that the jury must have conflated the essential functions inquiry with the direct threat inquiry and finding sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding that the plaintiff could not perform the essential functions of his position
  • claim filed more than 90 days after an NEOC determination should have been dismissed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bye, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.