· 8/26/1996
Frank Dufay and Mary Dufay, Husband and Wife v. Bank of America N.T. & S.A., of Oregon and Trw Inc.
Citations
- 94 F.3d 561
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 10393
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6323
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21924
- 1996 WL 479215
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating district court’s issuance of summary judgment because material facts remained as to when plaintiffs’ application was completed
- finding summary judgment inappropriate because of genuine factual dispute as to whether defendant bank acted with “reasonable diligence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Schroeder, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.