Skip to main content
· 8/26/1996

Frank Dufay and Mary Dufay, Husband and Wife v. Bank of America N.T. & S.A., of Oregon and Trw Inc.

Citations

  • 94 F.3d 561
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 10393
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6323
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21924
  • 1996 WL 479215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating district court’s issuance of summary judgment because material facts remained as to when plaintiffs’ application was completed
  • finding summary judgment inappropriate because of genuine factual dispute as to whether defendant bank acted with “reasonable diligence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Schroeder, Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.